For Christmas I got an interesting gift from a buddy - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, higgledy-piggledy.xyz with a couple of easy triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, and really funny in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, but it's also a bit repeated, and extremely verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collating data about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr can order any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, including stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and created "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is intended as a "customised gag present", fishtanklive.wiki and the books do not get offered even more.

He hopes to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human customers.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to regard developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for imaginative functions ought to be prohibited, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on people's work without approval should be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful but let's construct it morally and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to use developers' material on the internet to assist develop their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and messing up the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining among its finest performing markets on the vague pledge of growth."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that provides each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to help them license their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library containing public information from a broad variety of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, but he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a number of claims against AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the without their permission, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its technology for a fraction of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of errors and hallucinations, and utahsyardsale.com it can be rather difficult to read in parts since it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm unsure for how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.